Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/07/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Back to film!
From: j2m46 at hotmail.fr (Jean-Michel Mertz)
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 19:18:55 +0200
References: <79E8CEB808BF436C8EED56D7912954FB@jimnichols>, <CC27541D.21219%mark@rabinergroup.com>, <BLU155-W26B3026B59F2F66588DC988DD40@phx.gbl>, <CAFUrs5CxFOn9nmx3NyDXwdUYkeCVCx2hZOLtaeMcufz2S+ZndA@mail.gmail.com>

Thank you, Daniel. Yes, this is the "modern" elmar 2.8 - 50 which I bought 
used about 8 years ago for about $ 600, which I find relatively "cheap" for 
a Leica lens. I would have thought this lens was easy to find ... obviously 
not! I also have a classic (1938) elmar 50 which I use once in awhile with 
the IIIc - but the latter is not to be compared with the modern elmar which 
produces excellent contrast.Jean-Michel
 > Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:27:19 +0200
> From: dlridings at gmail.com
> To: lug at leica-users.org
> Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Back to film!
> 
> Beautiful ... that must be the modern 50/2.8 Elmar ... and it
> convinces me to keep looking for one :-)
> 
> Daniel
> 
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Jean-Michel Mertz <j2m46 at hotmail.fr> 
> wrote:
> >
> > I often use the elmar 50 - 2.8 collapsible on my M8, I find it to be a 
> > very sharp and also soft lens, cf this portrait of my brother in law 
> > Bernard. Not too good for landscapes, though. 
> > Jean-Michel<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Jean-Michel/PORTRAITS/PORTRAITS.jpg.html>
> >  > Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 16:51:41 -0400
> >> From: mark at rabinergroup.com
> >> To: lug at leica-users.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Back to film!
> >>
> >> When my X, Karen who many of you know got her M6 a decade back her 
> >> choice of
> >> glass was the modern 50 2.8 Elmar collapsible which she got in 
> >> "chrome". I
> >> was very envious of it but now have thanks to a LUG friend a very old 
> >> 3.5 50
> >> Elmar collapsible which came with my IIIF. I do feel very Barnack like 
> >> when
> >> shooting with it. The results I've gotten with it for me have plenty of
> >> resonance; glow; fingerprint. Though I have a 3.5 35mm Summaron and a 90
> >> elmar I only get this feeling when using the 50 which I believe is 
> >> decades
> >> older.
> >>
> >> Mark William Rabiner
> >> Photography
> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> >>
> >>
> >> > From: Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net>
> >> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> >> > Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 15:07:32 -0500
> >> > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> >> > Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Back to film!
> >> >
> >> > George,
> >> >
> >> > I think you will find that the 50mm 2.8 Elmar is the exception to the 
> >> > rule.
> >> > It was a modernization and slight improvement on the 50/3.5 Elmar, 
> >> > and kept
> >> > the same name.
> >> >
> >> > Jim Nichols
> >> > Tullahoma, TN USA
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist3 at mac.com>
> >> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> >> > Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2012 2:55 PM
> >> > Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Back to film!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> On Jul 14, 2012, at 2:27 PM, Daniel Ridings wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Well, I have several of those too, Mark. When I wrote "old" I meant
> >> >>> the old 50/2.8 not the modern "new" 50/2.8 Elmar. I'd love to have 
> >> >>> one
> >> >>> of those. I keep my eyes open every Friday.
> >> >>
> >> >> I thought 2.8 always = elmarit
> >> >> no?
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards,
> >> >> George Lottermoser
> >> >> george at imagist.com
> >> >> http://www.imagist.com
> >> >> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Leica Users Group.
> >> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
                                          


In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Back to film!)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] IMG: Back to film!)
Message from j2m46 at hotmail.fr (Jean-Michel Mertz) ([Leica] IMG: Back to film!)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] IMG: Back to film!)