Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/07/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Back to film!
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 15:07:32 -0500
References: <856435263.14342281342280813571.JavaMail.root@dsmdc-mail-mbs12><CC273F31.211E2%mark@rabinergroup.com><CAFUrs5DZfW34TdK=iwUphkxmD1tFToq5+OjAjxxS=RmHQkXOJw@mail.gmail.com> <1134FC4C-E0F6-4480-BE68-5E90C3D28E7C@mac.com>
 
George,

I think you will find that the 50mm 2.8 Elmar is the exception to the rule. 
It was a modernization and slight improvement on the 50/3.5 Elmar, and kept 
the same name.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist3 at mac.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2012 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Back to film!


>
> On Jul 14, 2012, at 2:27 PM, Daniel Ridings wrote:
>
>> Well, I have several of those too, Mark. When I wrote "old" I meant
>> the old 50/2.8 not the modern "new" 50/2.8 Elmar. I'd love to have one
>> of those. I keep my eyes open every Friday.
>
> I thought 2.8 always = elmarit
> no?
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] IMG: Back to film!)
 In reply to: Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] IMG: Back to film!)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] IMG: Back to film!)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] IMG: Back to film!)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: Back to film!)