Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica M lenses on the Fuji X-Pro 1 - IMAGE SHOT @6400
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:22:45 +0200
References: <CAF8hL-HhRh8xXwaHa6oyKn822hhhyUZyC=gG9h6KVyuFuevENw@mail.gmail.com> <CBFE73B8.2777E%bd@bdcolenphoto.com> <CAH1UNJ3uXMJ+4y+e2Fa8VRwpZrrXP6axXvEgRFm01E5yW+QM5A@mail.gmail.com> <A0ADB91C-E59B-4681-A79E-9AF4C396B00E@frozenlight.eu>

As Nathan said

Plus, had you noticed the funny for a colour shot Leica advert, right  
of the lady's head ...

Amiti?s
Philippe



Le 14 juin 12 ? 07:49, Nathan Wajsman a ?crit :

> Impressive!
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>
>
> YNWA
>
>
>
> On Jun 14, 2012, at 4:09 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
>
>> Here is one shot in the field at ISO 3200 - I usually use Auto ISO  
>> 3200 as
>> a standard setting - I would use Auto ISO 6400 if Fuji gave that  
>> option,
>> which they do not! This is with the 35mm lens at 1/18s hand held. No
>> sharpening, no noise reduction shot as in-camera Fine JPG:
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/jayanand/album254/_DSF9946.jpg.html
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jayanand
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:19 AM, B. D. Colen <bd at bdcolenphoto.com>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> So here is an image shot 6400 ISO, using, I believe, the 35 1.4 @  
>>> 1.4 on
>>> the Fuji XPro1. I shot in RAW, converted to JPG, did some very minor
>>> levels adjustment, and NO sharpening, and NO noise reduction. The  
>>> one
>>> problem with this image, and all other RAW images shot with the  
>>> Xpro, is
>>> that, quite obviously, Adobe has not yet got the DNG Converter  
>>> worked out
>>> quite right for the Xpro files. For now, I am going to shoot JPGs.
>>>
>>> But in terms of the 6400 iso - I've got less than no complaints.  
>>> When I am
>>> shooting low light images I am a., not looking for fine micro  
>>> detail, or
>>> b., planning to carry around a loupe to examine the images.  
>>> Compare this
>>> to any image from an M8 or M9 shot at 3200 iso, and, for that  
>>> matter,
>>> compare it to the Fuji 1600 iso film shot in an M. It's great to  
>>> demand
>>> clean images when shooting digital at 100 or 200 iso, or when  
>>> shooting
>>> something like Fuji Acros, but an image at 6400?
>>>
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/bdcolen/PHOTOS/060212_and_Commencement_003
>>> 0.jpg.html
>>>
>>>
>>> PS - The photo is nothing - just a demonstration.  :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Leica M lenses on the Fuji X-Pro 1 - IMAGE SHOT @6400)
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Leica M lenses on the Fuji X-Pro 1 - Mark + rant)
Message from bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Leica M lenses on the Fuji X-Pro 1 - IMAGE SHOT @6400)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Leica M lenses on the Fuji X-Pro 1 - IMAGE SHOT @6400)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Leica M lenses on the Fuji X-Pro 1 - IMAGE SHOT @6400)