Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/05/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] MM Review
From: zoeica at mac.com (chris williams)
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 18:46:02 -0500
References: <CA+yJO1CSweJKUJLs82A8tJy9cR8JzbRJmvB=LkeH41SfN1S1Mw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ4y7gyGhLgXmCQ1C720FEQGSb+qj+kYmqyf4OSPyq1aY7LmvQ@mail.gmail.com> <D0DF9662923541EDB7481CA2E0F3458E@jimnichols> <C3E562E113C440DCB3FC00E1C5E55DCF@billHP>

Well it was $25K and the Frankenstein Nikon/Kodak was really meant for the 
newspaper biz but by then Canon was coming out with the 1D and that was the 
end of the B&W only idea plus Kodak never could make their own camera 
bodies. Fuji ran into the same
problem even though Fuji had a kickass 1600iso before any one else.






Chris Williams
504-231-6261
www.zoeicaimages.net

Sent from my iholga 


On May 14, 2012, at 6:37 PM, Bill Pearce <billcpearce at cox.net> wrote:

> Yes, when Kodak was in the digital dslr camera business they did, but it 
> wasn't commercially successful, for whatever reason  I don't 
> know/remember. I do know that they could have been a player in the dslr 
> business, but dropped the ball. Probably so did Fuji.
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Jim Nichols
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 6:31 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] MM Review
> 
> Bob,
> 
> I believe Kodak produced one some years ago, based on a Nikon body.  
> Perhaps
> he is referring to color files converted to B&W.
> 
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Baron" <robertbaron1 at 
> gmail.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 6:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] MM Review
> 
> 
>> I'm just curious here.  When I read  "He does say that the Leica MM gives
>> the best B&W
>> files of any digital camera available." I ask: How many digital cameras
>> produce b&w files?
>> 
>> I'm not following this new stuff all that closely but that said I was
>> unaware of any others.
>> 
>> Enquiring Minds, etc.
>> 
>> --Bob
>> 
>> ==On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> LUG:
>>> 
>>> If anybody is considering the M Monochrom, I cannot recommend highly 
>>> enough
>>> Sean Reid's review of the camera.  It requires a subscription but is well
>>> worth the price.  His information and insight about metering with the
>>> camera are invaluable.   He does say that the Leica MM gives the best B&W
>>> files of any digital camera available.
>>> 
>>> http://www.reidreviews.com
>>> 
>>> Lots of good information here!
>>> 
>>> Tina
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Tina Manley, ASMP
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] MM Review)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] MM Review)
Message from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] MM Review)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] MM Review)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] MM Review)