Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti
From: alal at poly.edu (Akhil Lal)
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 10:33:39 -0400
References: <CAAsXt4MggD0Led2FwTjZQPvNnWUDzcC0wnC0yUE7skxjQAYDmA@mail.gmail.com> <002301cd15db$2bd89dd0$8389d970$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <CABmfTOXG5g1ZO9AVaj8eEbJF5_LNKaPry9nn4cwsP1zDmXxdtA@mail.gmail.com> <002e01cd15e4$1f45b040$5dd110c0$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <B92AC1B6-E2C5-4A25-9210-B42A6D7084AF@comcast.net>

Thanks for clearing this up Len.

Regards,
Akhil

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+alal=poly.edu at leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+alal=poly.edu at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Leonard
Taupier
Sent: 08 April 2012 21:04
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti

Apendix D in Erwin Puts original Leica lens Compendium list all the code
numbers that correspond to the actual focal length.

For the 75 MM
47 = 74.7
50 = 75.0
53 = 75.3
56 = 75.6

The appendix lists the codes for:

Elmar 50mm
Other 50mm
75mm
90mm
135mm

Len



On Apr 8, 2012, at 8:02 PM, John McMaster wrote:

> Yep, M9 and all lenses went off at the same time. Both the Noctilux 
> and 75mm Summilux were 6-bit coded during the trip.
>
> As an aside, my 75mm has the number 50 sideways to the m/feet marks
> - does
> that mean it is an 80mm? Are they all like that??
>
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> Wide open the point of correct focus should be slightly behind the 
> focus point (about 2.5mm) but nowhere near as far as yours is.  Did 
> you send your camera in at the same time?
>
> Marty
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:28 AM, John McMaster <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz>
> wrote:
>> I have just tested my Noctilux and 75mm Summilux at closest 
>> focussing, both tested fine at distance. The Noctilux is spot on but 
>> the 75mm is back focussing ~50mm and this is after a tweak at 
>> Solms....
>>
>> john
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> My noctilux and M9 are back to NJ for the third time. If you 
>> remember, the dealer sent them back 3 weeks ago because I complained 
>> it was back focusing and the dealer finally agreed. Dealer got it 
>> back and no change. So back again but "the noctilux person is on 
>> vacation until the
> 16th..."
>> Stinks...
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)