Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti
From: kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney)
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:29:08 -0500
References: <CAAsXt4MggD0Led2FwTjZQPvNnWUDzcC0wnC0yUE7skxjQAYDmA@mail.gmail.com> <002301cd15db$2bd89dd0$8389d970$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <CAAsXt4MT9+P-4n+LYyzdiEgvacUUTwr9mqdj3q_g-5=RaK9A+g@mail.gmail.com>

I wonder if Leica could have the system in Canon cameras, where an 
optimum sensor to lens distance is recorded for each lens.  Or is this a 
different problem?

Ken

On 4/8/2012 6:02 PM, Robert Adler wrote:
> crazy...
>
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 3:58 PM, John McMaster<john at 
> chiaroscuro.co.nz>wrote:
>
>> I have just tested my Noctilux and 75mm Summilux at closest focussing, 
>> both
>> tested fine at distance. The Noctilux is spot on but the 75mm is back
>> focussing ~50mm and this is after a tweak at Solms....
>>
>> john
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> My noctilux and M9 are back to NJ for the third time. If you remember, the
>> dealer sent them back 3 weeks ago because I complained it was back 
>> focusing
>> and the dealer finally agreed. Dealer got it back and no change. So back
>> again but "the noctilux person is on vacation until the 16th..."
>> Stinks...
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>



In reply to: Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)