Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] X-Pro Disappointed
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:03:00 +0200
References: <E3D695C3-8FCB-4AA6-AA31-B44CC563B73D@me.com> <98E9BC28-AAB4-4477-B71C-6DBADE047D3C@archiphoto.com> <CD2EE17C-A54A-4C05-876A-E0432D8665F0@me.com> <CAF8hL-EuGjvpU_OfHm8mdUwrzkBd7Pcd+nBLAV_ABhcsKD-0Gw@mail.gmail.com> <94078836-F367-4D18-93D5-298CF90B3CBD@ameritech.net> <CAF8hL-GjS5oA1jmJU+zWCoix-VkNvg2c+A4My_tk0tT9yHksqA@mail.gmail.com> <14D400D8-3367-47D0-934B-03917CCB1655@ameritech.net> <AE9C8884-DDD1-47DB-B6CC-84A70BB60325@teleport.com> <998d95bbd6bbfb8d5d52043d97944fa9@mail.gmail.com> <4C9E697D-0A27-49E2-B131-44AFF152F0E1@me.com> <F3E5CDD3-7DCD-4868-8A86-CD415E7C6325@teleport.com>

Just shows how competent the folks a Pro Photo are then.

I assume that the X-Pro has a similar arrangement as the X-100: an optical 
viewfinder with an option to change to EVF. When you put the X-100 in macro 
mode, it changes to EVF automatically in order to eliminate parralax error. 
Ingenious.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/


YNWA



On Apr 5, 2012, at 7:35 AM, Mark Kronquist wrote:

> Well the new from box camera was new to the crew at Pro Photo today they 
> were certain it was EVF only...and I left it because of that...oh well 
> they'll make more
> On Apr 4, 2012, at 10:33 PM, Gerry Walden wrote:
> 
>> I would go along with what Jim says.
>> 
>> There is most certainly an optical viewfinder with a brightline and 
>> variable info depending on what you want. This is switchable from the 
>> menu. The viewfinder changes angle of view depending on lens fitted and 
>> the brightline even changes colour depending on the contrast of the view.
>> 
>> The size is within millimetres of the M9, and, whilst the weight is 
>> lighter, the camera is certainly solid and built from a solid chunk of 
>> aluminium.
>> 
>> Gerry
>> 
>> Gerry Walden
>> +44 (0)23 8046 3076 or
>> +44 (0)797 287 7932
>> www.gwpics.com
>> 
>> On 5 Apr 2012, at 04:44, Jim Shulman wrote:
>> 
>>> Really? I tried two different lenses, and had the EVF off.  The regular
>>> optical VF adjusted depending on the lens attached.  Worked just fine.  
>>> In
>>> fact, so far this is the nicest digital camera I've tried.
>>> 
>>> Jim
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org
>>> [mailto:lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org] On 
>>> Behalf Of
>>> Mark Kronquist
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 11:41 PM
>>> To: Leica Users Group
>>> Subject: [Leica] X-Pro Disappointed
>>> 
>>> Seemed flimsy compared to the X-100 (the M3 like one) and I was
>>> disappointed that the VF eas EVF only...My 2 cents  Mark On Apr 4, 2012,
>>> at 7:43 PM, Dante Stella wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Thanks. To tell you the truth, the size of the X100 is a little small.
>>>> 
>>>> If the X-Pro focus is even just as good, it will be fine. People
>>> complain that the X100 doesn't have DSLR focusing speed, but it is
>>> decidedly faster than a human actually focusing an M (as opposed to zone
>>> focusing). It's like the joke - I don't need to outrun the alligator - I
>>> just need to outrun my friend...
>>>> 
>>>> When I get back, I'll report on traveling with the X100 vs. the M8.
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> Dante
>>>> 
>>>> On Apr 4, 2012, at 17:55, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I'm not getting an X-Pro, but someone said that at ISO 128,000, it's
>>>>> better than his 5D MKII at ISO 3200.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The only negatives I have heard (besides, price and whether the size
>>>>> suits
>>>>> you) are the lens selection and potential autofocus problem. Image
>>>>> Quality is never mentioned as a concern.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from gwpics at me.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] X-Pro Disappointed)
In reply to: Message from gwpics at me.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] Gallery of Fuji X-Pro1 Images)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Gallery of Fuji X-Pro1 Images)
Message from gwpics at me.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] Gallery of Fuji X-Pro1 Images)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Gallery of Fuji X-Pro1 Images)
Message from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] Gallery of Fuji X-Pro1 Images)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Gallery of Fuji X-Pro1 Images)
Message from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] Gallery of Fuji X-Pro1 Images)
Message from mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist) ([Leica] X-Pro Disappointed)
Message from jshulman at judgecrater.com (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] X-Pro Disappointed)
Message from gwpics at me.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] X-Pro Disappointed)
Message from mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist) ([Leica] X-Pro Disappointed)