Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Handled a Biogon Ultra-Wide!
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 22:50:04 +0000
References: <CAF8hL-GfrLPRriNzC+QgCZ8eJsKbYF6Zkt13__s4Ez6_zGEQCA@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E94B41ECEF@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>, <CAF8hL-EVTP6ryA8ahpSkVXFwOuP3P8-4Zz5f9SEyD2K2CWn1aw@mail.gmail.com>

There is no SW ;-)

Do you mean an earlier SWC with the original viewfinder?
http://liesifoo.blogspot.co.nz/2011/01/hasselblad-swc-user-review.html

The difference between an SWC and SWC/M is a spacer on the tripod mount to 
allow a polaroid back to be fitted.
There are chrome lens, chrome T* and black T* in C lens depending on age (I 
found the black T* best).
There are also CF lens version with that viewfinder

The 903 and 905 have the newer viewfinder
http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/nikon/hasselblad/cameras/hasselmodels/models/superwide.htm

john
________________________________________

I didn't pay that much attention to the lens, but I guess it's probably a
Super Wide (SW) rather than the original Supreme Wide Angle (SWA)

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:54 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> 
wrote:

> Not sure what lens you are talking about.... an SWA?
>
> I have owned three over the years, a '60s SWC (chrome lens but T*), this
> was not as sharp as a 1980 black T* SWC/M. I had a 903 but did not use it
> too much before I sold out of Hasselblad again, if I knew what it would be
> worth now.... ;-)
>
> john
> ________________________________________
>
>
> The local shop Keeble & Shucat does not have a SWC to rent (neither does
> anyone online), but that's a well-used Ultra Wide in the used dept so I
> played with it a little. Didn't actually shoot any film though.
>
> The handling is nice. Since this is the original model, the viewfinder is
> pretty lousy. Overall, it does feel it would be nice to carry and use.
>
> Not sure if anyone actually BUYS the new 905 SWC for $10K+, but this is
> certainly the lowest priced Biogon I have seen.
>


Replies: Reply from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] Handled a Biogon Ultra-Wide!)
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Handled a Biogon Ultra-Wide!)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Handled a Biogon Ultra-Wide!)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Handled a Biogon Ultra-Wide!)