Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M10 May 10
From: mark at (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 00:30:01 -0400

I think the Know if they want the Magnum photogs to put down their DSLR's
and pick up Leicas without being paid to do so but the other way around they
are going to have to give them close to what they are already getting:
Which is 64,000 iso @ cruising speed.

Mark R.

> From: Richard Man <richard at>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at>
> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:09:25 -0700
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] M10 May 10
> If a lens can be for $10K or $11K, why not a camera. Lets just say for
> argument sake: 24MP, usable ISO up to 3200. Sapphire glass LCD, *may be*
> (but probably not) hybrid OVF. I can see they can easily ask $11K to $13K
> for that. This is Leica we are talking about. If so, they will probably
> keep the M9 for the "cheapskates."
> Of course I am personally more interested if it's a B&W sensor with more
> dynamic range, but we went through that and way beyond already.
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Frank Filippone <red735i at 
>> Choke......
>> How high can they go?
>> Frank Filippone
>> Red735i at
>> It's M9 + MORE (higher MP, hyrbid VF, whatever) and it will be
>> $2000-$3000 over an M9
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See for more information
> -- 
> // richard <>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See for more information

Replies: Reply from john at (John McMaster) ([Leica] M10 May 10)
Reply from richard at (Richard Man) ([Leica] M10 May 10)
In reply to: Message from richard at (Richard Man) ([Leica] M10 May 10)