Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Comparison of Two Scans
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:32:31 +0100
References: <D965B5A6124649259FE7B07D147B30F1@jimnichols>

Jim,

I prefer the high resolution version, is the picture I've saw and  
already commented previously

cheers
Lluis


El 16/02/2012, a las 21:18, Jim Nichols escribi?:

> My original VueScan controlled scan with the Epson 2450 was done at  
> low resolution.  The subsequent scan was done at maximum resolution  
> of this scanner.
>
>> From comments, it appears that several folks prefer the first  
>> scan.  I see sharper details in the second scan, but perhaps my  
>> adjustments were not well chosen.
>
> Here are links to the two images.  Please help me solve my dilemma.
>
> Original (reconstructed):
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/R+_amp_+N+VueScan+_amp_+Epson+low-res+scan.jpg.html
>
> High resolution scan:
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/R_amp_N+with+VueScan+on+Epson.jpg.html
>
> Comments and critiques welcomed.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Comparison of Two Scans)