Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Controversial?
From: photo.forrest at (Phil Forrest)
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:46:01 -0500
References: <>

They skillfully put in some of the most current moneymakers for camera
retailers to help inflate sales during this slow time of the year. 
And of course there were a few factual errors as well.
So we'll have to take this controversy with a grain of salt and

Phil Forrest

On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:48:38 +0100
"philippe.amard" <philippe.amard at> wrote:

> Might be ...
> Bien cordialement de Metz
> Philippe
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See for more information

In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at (philippe.amard) ([Leica] OT: Controversial?)