Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Controversial?
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:10:12 -0800
References: <0D49E68B-9AA6-46B9-BF31-BC4B34A99E86@sfr.fr> <78EF0F88-A0E6-4CF5-B934-1BADAC9AEFDC@embarqmail.com> <D6FE6DE917ED43C2B05F80CF33DBC446@billHP>

#1 The camera I currently use


On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Bill Pearce <billcpearce at cox.net> wrote:

> There are what I would consider errors and ommissions on the list, as I
> consider the Xpan, Sony R1 and Panasonic LX2 mia, but I own 50, 38, 33, 26,
> 25, 9 and 3 and would like tohave 47 and 28. Now, when do we get the lens
> list?
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Ric Carter
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 4:22 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: Controversial?
>
>
> lists such as this are always wrong and right at the same time
>
> can cause entertaining discussion
>
> today, i own 44, 38, 20, 17, 15, 8, 4, & 1
>
> a couple more, i wish i owned
>
> ric
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2012, at 4:48 PM, philippe.amard wrote:
>
>  Might be ...
>> http://www.photographymonthly.**com/Magazine/2010/50-Greatest-**
>> Cameras-of-All-Time<http://www.photographymonthly.com/Magazine/2010/50-Greatest-Cameras-of-All-Time>
>>
>> Bien cordialement de Metz
>> Philippe
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See 
>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>>  more information
>>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See 
> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>  more information
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See 
> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>  more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] OT: Controversial?)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] OT: Controversial?)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] OT: Controversial?)