Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I recall that shooting compressed vs uncomprssed saves no time, is this not true? It clearly will save space as the file size differs, but storage time may not differ in spite of different file sizes, as it takes more time to process the file and make it smaller, even if it takes less time to store it. Henning may wish to comment on this, Steve On Jan 18, 2012, at 7:22 AM, Roger Hart wrote: > Bob, > > Well, it might worth a try. You would not be disappointed.! > > > Roger > > > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Robert Baron <robertbaron1 at gmail.com> > wrote: >> Roger, I started out shooting uncompressed with my M9 and quickly >> switched, saving file size and time. Also, if you are shooting both >> dng+jpg the buffer will fill up much faster; most of us I think are >> now shooting just dng. >> >> Now to the important stuff: If you could score a loaner M9 and 21mm >> Summilux, could I score a loaner 911? >> >> ;-) >> >> --Bob >> >> ==On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Roger Hart <rhart76 at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Thanks for the point, Herb. I was shooting uncompressed. >>> >>> Roger Hart >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> On Jan 17, 2012, at 8:41 PM, Herbert Kanner <kanner at acm.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Regarding the delay after you took seven shots: Are you using >>>> compressed or uncompressed DNG? I raised the question some time ago on >>>> the LUG and everyone who responded said they could detect no difference >>>> between compressed and uncompressed results. By compressing the DNGs, >>>> you cut in half the file size and therefore speed up the camera's >>>> storing of the raw data. The respondents said they compressed the DNGs >>>> for that reason, not to save disc space. >>>> >>>> Herb >>>> >>>> >>>>> Well, I went and did it to myself this time: A simple camera test has >>>>> camera lust. I was able to get a loaner M9, along with a 21mm >>>>> Summilux, to test for a few days. With the Detroit auto show opening, >>>>> also known as the North American International Auto Show, I loaded up >>>>> the M9 to see if it is something I could live without. I've been an M8 >>>>> owner and user nearly since the camera was introduced, and other than >>>>> the crop sensor, I have no problems with the camera. But the M9 has >>>>> widened my eyes a bit further...the full-frame sensor does make a >>>>> difference, and the larger files are nice to work with. My only real >>>>> issue with the camera is that I kept filling up the buffer while >>>>> shooting the cars on the stands. Seven frames and I was left waiting. >>>>> This seems way worse than in the M8...granted, the files are larger, >>>>> but it was one thing that I really didn't like about the camera. But >>>>> certainly not a deal-breaker. >>>>> >>>>> Here is a link to some photos: http://gallery.me.com/rhart76#100361 >>>>> >>>>> All are shot with a 28mm Elmarit, except where noted. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Roger Hart >>>>> Detroit >>>>> USA >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Herbert Kanner >>>> kanner at acm.org >>>> 650-326-8204 >>>> >>>> Question authority and the authorities will question you. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information