Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I wonder of us CS5 users will get an update to that 2012 profile? Hope so! In Photoshop you can actually switch back and forth between the profiles. There's a pull-down menu buried deep in the Camera Raw controls that allows you to choose. So, updating to a newer one does not take away the ability to use the old one if you need it for something. -- Chris Crawford Fine Art Photography Fort Wayne, Indiana 260-437-8990 http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work! http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798 Become a fan on Facebook On 1/10/12 3:22 AM, "Gerry Walden" <gwpics at me.com> wrote: >I had forgotten that you can upgrade the camera calibration profile in >LR, and I notice in the new LR4 Beta there is now a 2012 profile, which >seems to answer my question. Thanks Chris! > >Gerry > >Gerry Walden LRPS >+44 (0)23 8046 3076 (Office) >+44 (0)797 287 7932 (Mobile) >Web: www.gwpics.com > > > > > > >On 10 Jan 2012, at 08:19, Chris Crawford wrote: > >> Don't know about Lightroom, but in Photoshop CS5, the raw converter >>allows >> you to choose between the 2010 profile or the 2003 profile! So you could >> still open stuff with the old profile system in later versions of >> Photoshop. >> >> -- >> Chris Crawford >> Fine Art Photography >> Fort Wayne, Indiana >> 260-437-8990 >> >> http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio >> >> http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work! >> >> http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798 >> Become a fan on Facebook >> >> >> >> On 1/10/12 2:35 AM, "Gerry Walden" <gwpics at me.com> wrote: >> >>> Richard >>> >>> That is my point. They upgrade to a new 2010 profile, but if a .dng >>> conversion was done way back then there a similar upgrade to a new .dng >>> version or is it stuck at the old level/values? >>> >>> Gerry >>> >>> Gerry Walden LRPS >>> +44 (0)23 8046 3076 (Office) >>> +44 (0)797 287 7932 (Mobile) >>> Web: www.gwpics.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10 Jan 2012, at 07:32, Richard Man wrote: >>> >>>> The preset may be different, and may be it's set up to be (for >>>>example) >>>> more contrast to begin. >>>> >>>> "Camera Calibration" would also definitely make a difference. The >>>>latest >>>> "2010" Process probably looks better than the "2003" Process, and the >>>> "Adobe Standard" profile is probably better than the "Embedded" >>>>profile. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Gerry Walden <gwpics at me.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Possibly (hopefully) they are Richard, but I think that Adobe >>>>>improves >>>>> the >>>>> 'translation' of native RAW files as time goes on. Maybe I am wrong, >>>>> and >>>>> someone will put me right on this. >>>>> >>>>> Gerry >>>>> >>>>> Gerry Walden LRPS >>>>> +44 (0)23 8046 3076 (Office) >>>>> +44 (0)797 287 7932 (Mobile) >>>>> Web: www.gwpics.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 10 Jan 2012, at 07:08, Richard Man wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> You sure it's not just that your skills are better now than in 2006? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Gerry Walden <gwpics at me.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I am working on older images (2006) in Lightroom, and I am finding >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> they are a lot better than when I worked on them back then. They >>>>>>>are >>>>> .raf >>>>>>> files from a Fuji S2, and I think they have been improved as Adobe >>>>>>> has >>>>>>> updated the way it reads the files. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now for the question - if files are converted to .dng files is that >>>>>>> conversion then 'set in stone' or is the conversion updated as >>>>>>>Adobe >>>>>>> improves its translation of the files? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, as I am sure someone here knows the answer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gerry >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gerry Walden LRPS >>>>>>> +44 (0)23 8046 3076 (Office) >>>>>>> +44 (0)797 287 7932 (Mobile) >>>>>>> Web: www.gwpics.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more >>>>>>>information >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information