Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Don't know about Lightroom, but in Photoshop CS5, the raw converter allows you to choose between the 2010 profile or the 2003 profile! So you could still open stuff with the old profile system in later versions of Photoshop. -- Chris Crawford Fine Art Photography Fort Wayne, Indiana 260-437-8990 http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work! http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798 Become a fan on Facebook On 1/10/12 2:35 AM, "Gerry Walden" <gwpics at me.com> wrote: >Richard > >That is my point. They upgrade to a new 2010 profile, but if a .dng >conversion was done way back then there a similar upgrade to a new .dng >version or is it stuck at the old level/values? > >Gerry > >Gerry Walden LRPS >+44 (0)23 8046 3076 (Office) >+44 (0)797 287 7932 (Mobile) >Web: www.gwpics.com > > > > > > >On 10 Jan 2012, at 07:32, Richard Man wrote: > >> The preset may be different, and may be it's set up to be (for example) >> more contrast to begin. >> >> "Camera Calibration" would also definitely make a difference. The latest >> "2010" Process probably looks better than the "2003" Process, and the >> "Adobe Standard" profile is probably better than the "Embedded" profile. >> >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Gerry Walden <gwpics at me.com> wrote: >> >>> Possibly (hopefully) they are Richard, but I think that Adobe improves >>>the >>> 'translation' of native RAW files as time goes on. Maybe I am wrong, >>>and >>> someone will put me right on this. >>> >>> Gerry >>> >>> Gerry Walden LRPS >>> +44 (0)23 8046 3076 (Office) >>> +44 (0)797 287 7932 (Mobile) >>> Web: www.gwpics.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10 Jan 2012, at 07:08, Richard Man wrote: >>> >>>> You sure it's not just that your skills are better now than in 2006? >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Gerry Walden <gwpics at me.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I am working on older images (2006) in Lightroom, and I am finding >>>>>that >>>>> they are a lot better than when I worked on them back then. They are >>> .raf >>>>> files from a Fuji S2, and I think they have been improved as Adobe >>>>>has >>>>> updated the way it reads the files. >>>>> >>>>> Now for the question - if files are converted to .dng files is that >>>>> conversion then 'set in stone' or is the conversion updated as Adobe >>>>> improves its translation of the files? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, as I am sure someone here knows the answer. >>>>> >>>>> Gerry >>>>> >>>>> Gerry Walden LRPS >>>>> +44 (0)23 8046 3076 (Office) >>>>> +44 (0)797 287 7932 (Mobile) >>>>> Web: www.gwpics.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information