Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/11/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I too will endorse the 200 Telyt. I think it is a fine lens. On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Lluis Ripoll <lluisripollquerol at gmail.com>wrote: > Thanks Philipppe, for you too! > > cheers > Lluis > > > El 18/11/2011, a las 8:05, philippe.amard escribi?: > > > +1 >> >> happy Friday! >> >> Philippe >> >> Le 18 nov. 11 ? 00:15, Ric Carter a ?crit : >> >> love the atmosphere on the first one >>> >>> ric >>> >>> >>> On Nov 17, 2011, at 6:11 PM, Lluis Ripoll wrote: >>> >>> If this can help, I've shot these ones with Visoflex III and M3 with a >>>> Telyt 4/200, IMO is very good glass, the 4.5... I don't know. >>>> >>>> these are scanned slides, film was Fuji Velvia >>>> >>>> http://gallery.leica-users.**org/v/luisrq/Flowers/08060202.**jpg.html<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Flowers/08060202.jpg.html> >>>> >>> >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See >>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >>> more information >>> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See >> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >> more information >> > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Leica Users Group. > See > http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for > more information > -- Chris Saganich www.imagebrooklyn.com