Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/09/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:59:39 +0530
References: <63C28AFB-46A8-4F3A-ABD1-D58A638C0660@mac.com> <4E84E6E0.4090508@cox.net>

Maybe it is worth a little flutter at $1.69....hardly any downside, maybe a
much bigger upside depending on what happens.
Cheers
Jayanand

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote:

> $1.69, from $30 ~four years or so ago.  Sounds like something I would own
> :(
>
> Ken
>
> On 9/28/2011 8:56 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>
>> <http://247wallst.com/2011/09/**24/kodak-its-credibility-gone-**
>> now-had-viability-trouble/<http://247wallst.com/2011/09/24/kodak-its-credibility-gone-now-had-viability-trouble/>
>> >
>>
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> george at imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/**imagist <http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See 
>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>>  more information
>>
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See 
> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>  more information
>


Replies: Reply from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil Forrest) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)