Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/09/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?
From: kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:45:04 -0500
References: <63C28AFB-46A8-4F3A-ABD1-D58A638C0660@mac.com>
 
$1.69, from $30 ~four years or so ago.  Sounds like something I would own :(

Ken

On 9/28/2011 8:56 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
> <http://247wallst.com/2011/09/24/kodak-its-credibility-gone-now-had-viability-trouble/>
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
 In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)