Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Question on relative VF brightness.... Canon/Nikon/R8/SL to Visoflex
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:53:27 +0200
References: <000401cc62ee$2e19e810$8a4db830$@earthlink.net>
 
Le 25 ao?t 11 ? 08:13, Frank Filippone a ?crit :

>
> I'm not looking for precisely made calculations or measurements, but  
> if you
> were to compare the relative brightness of the VF in the Nikon or  
> Canon AF
> cameras or the R8 or SL to the Visoflex, which would be brighter and  
> by how
> much?????
>

The SL comes first, hand down
followed by R8 (sighs)
far behind is my D700 (not 100% coverage either)

these are cameras I owned and used

Hope it answers your question
Ph


>
>
> The lenses in question are the 400 and 560 Telyts..
>
>
>
> Impressions are fine..
>
>
>
> Frank Filippone
>
> Red735i at earthlink.net
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Question on relative VF brightness.... Canon/Nikon/R8/SL to Visoflex)
Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Question on relative VF brightness.... Canon/Nikon/R8/SL to Visoflex)
 In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Question on relative VF brightness.... Canon/Nikon/R8/SL to Visoflex)