Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I vote for 1,2 &5 as Leica - but they are all fine photographs, and I do not think the perceived difference is critical to the quality/beauty/whatever. Cheers Jayanand On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Robert Meier <robertmeier at usjet.net> wrote: > I vote for Leica for the 1st, 3rd, and 5th. > > Robert > > > On Aug 22, 2011, at 11:14 PM, Doug Herr wrote: > > Richard Man wrote: >> >> Can you point out a couple sample images? >>> >>> >>> When I used a 400mm Canon lens people saw the difference between it and >>>> the >>>> 400mm f/6.8 Telyt, even at screen resolution. I didn't ask anyone if >>>> they >>>> saw a difference, they saw my website & e-mailed to ask what happened. >>>> >>>> >>> >> Hmmm... lots of variables involved including films, subjects and lighting, >> but let's see how perceptive LUGgers are. Some of these were made with a >> Leica lens, some with a Canon lens. >> >> http://www.wildlightphoto.com/**birds/phasianidae/rnphea01.**html<http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/phasianidae/rnphea01.html> >> http://www.wildlightphoto.com/**mammals/artiodactyls/btde03.**html<http://www.wildlightphoto.com/mammals/artiodactyls/btde03.html> >> http://www.wildlightphoto.com/**birds/bombycillidae/cewa00.**html<http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/bombycillidae/cewa00.html> >> http://www.wildlightphoto.com/**birds/tyrannidae/blph01.html<http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/tyrannidae/blph01.html> >> http://www.wildlightphoto.com/**birds/phasianidae/sogrou02.**html<http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/phasianidae/sogrou02.html> >> >> Doug Herr >> Sacramento >> http://www.wildlightphoto.com >> >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See >> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >> more information >> > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Leica Users Group. > See > http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for > more information >