Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Thinking about a D700 or D7000
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 23:08:19 +0930
References: <00fb01cc59b5$4f3ca970$edb5fc50$@earthlink.net> <423400457.207128.1313240996835.JavaMail.root@sz0090a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net>

The readers for CF cards, being multi-pin, are easier to damage, as
are the the in-camera connections.  If you bend or snap a pin,
everything is ruined.  I have had a reader that broke and caused me
considerable grief, but I eventually recovered the files.  SD cards
have a sliding contact and there are no fine parts that can get bent
or break.

Marty


On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:39 PM, J. Newell <john.o.newell at comcast.net> 
wrote:
> CF cards have faster write speeds but are physically larger and tend to be 
> more expensive than SD cards. Not relevant for most users, they also have 
> a higher potential capacity.
> For the fumble-fingered, they're harder to drop. ;-)
>
>
> As a non-technical impression, I read tons of posts about problems with SD 
> cards and don't remember the last time I read about a CF card problem, but 
> that's just impression, not science.
>
>
> John Newell
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Frank Filippone" <red735i at earthlink.net>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 8:34:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Thinking about a D700 or D7000
>
> Question on the type of memory card used...
>
> Is there any advantage to a CF card relative to a SD card? Vice versa?
>
> Yes, I realize one card is smaller than the other... but I wonder why
> Nikon ( for one) uses CF cards in some cameras, and SD cards in others.....
>
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at earthlink.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+red735i=earthlink.net at leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+red735i=earthlink.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of 
> A.
> Lal
> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 12:54 AM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Thinking about a D700 or D7000
>
>
>> I have also looked into the D700, which seems to be unfortunately very
>> hard to find in dealers shelves, outside of the >occasional demo.
>
> Rumours are that the D700 is no longer being made and will be replaced by a
> 24MP FF model later this month.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from john.o.newell at comcast.net (J. Newell) ([Leica] Thinking about a D700 or D7000)
Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] Thinking about a D700 or D7000)
In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Thinking about a D700 or D7000)
Message from john.o.newell at comcast.net (J. Newell) ([Leica] Thinking about a D700 or D7000)