Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] indoor photography
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 02:33:18 +0200
References: <4E2A1458.6030508@cox.net>

Ken,

It looks to me as a great image. Did you printed it (wet print), I  
think you will see better thegreat potential of this image enhacing a  
little the brighness of the high zones of the sand.

I like it very much

Saludos
Lluis


El 23/07/2011, a las 2:22, Ken Carney escribi?:

> Too hot to do much outdoors, so I thought I would get caught up on  
> scanning.  Here is one from Death Valley.   This was TriX, with a  
> Schneider 135 lens.  I thought I had the exposure and development  
> nailed, but the negative and the safety neg were thin, so I re-fixed  
> and re-washed this neg and intensified in selenium 1:3 (the little  
> camera cards are starting to look better all the time).  It is TriX  
> 320, developed in D76 1:1 in a rotary tube.  C&C most welcome since  
> I have never been really happy with this image.
>
> Ken
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/kcarney/dune+2011.jpg.html
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] indoor photography)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] indoor photography)
In reply to: Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] indoor photography)