Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I beg to differ. We are talking the old Noctilux, which may be of interest to collectors, but for taking pictures surely the new one is better. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog YNWA On Jul 22, 2011, at 3:42 PM, scleroplex wrote: > dear leon, > > hang on to your Noctilux > > no digital camera is worth selling that lens for. > bharani > > > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:26:00 -0400 > From: "Leon Pomeroy " <drleonpomeroy at verizon.net> > Subject: [Leica] Lusting for an M9 > To: <lug at leica-users.org> > Message-ID: <000601cc480e$50a11de0$f1e359a0$@verizon.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > All: I'm considering selling old technology to buy new technology. The love > objects I have in mind are the following: 1. The original Noctilux, 50mm, > f1.2 lens. 2. The M5 body. 3. The R-Macro 100 mm f2.8 lens. Have any of you > any knowledge of what they might fetch given my wife's insistence I think > about selling them before going digital with the M9? If you wish to respond > off list I can be reached at: drleonpomeroy at verizon.net , Thanks, Leon > Pomeroy, 2010 Year Book Contributor with Canon DSLR. > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >