Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/06/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thank you everyone for looking and commenting on and off list. The first pleases me for its more obvious appeal but I kinda like some elements of the others. All of these are meant to include some framing, even...shock for me, some OoF elements. George the tree on right of the first is meant to complement the reflaction on the left edge. I'll look at refining that. Thanks for your specific comment there. Ric I'm glad tht you saw what I did in the second which is veering towards messy but I like the geometric framing. Cheers Geoff *Life's not black and white, except at both ends* http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman On 23 June 2011 07:14, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote: > > On Jun 22, 2011, at 12:45 AM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote: > > > I had a morning with a nature photography tutor. Crummy light largely but > > lots of interesting conversation. I had duck soup for lunch > > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/135778392 > > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/135778393 > > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/135778394 > > the first = magical > (wondering why you chose to leave the OOF tree trunk on the right) > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >