Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/06/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Acros-100 is a great film, but it is about as far as the old film as you can get. Very nice and clean. On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:15 PM, James Laird <digiratidoc at gmail.com> wrote: > I might try some Efke 50 or 100. I've heard some good reports on > Neopan Acros-100 too. Anyone using this film? > > Jim Laird > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Henning Wulff <henningw at archiphoto.com> > wrote: > > I was talking to Tom Abrahamsson this morning, and he recollected as did > I > > that HCB said once when asked about the sprocket hole strip, and why it > was > > missing: 'I ate them', implying at least that he had done it for whatever > > reason, and that this is likely the original. > > > > On the other hand we're all just guessing and inferring from hearsay, and > > probably the full 'truth' will never come out anymore. And it really > doesn't > > matter. > > > > As far as 'old style' film is concerned, some of the stuff that Efke > markets > > comes closer than today's Tri-X and HP5+ or other films from the majors. > The > > Efke offerings come from a couple of different manufacturers and are > based > > on old Adox and Orwo emulsions. MACO also produces some (and Efke markets > > some of those, as well). > > > > > > > > At 1:53 PM -0400 6/10/11, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote: > >> > >> Henning is right! I stand corrected. I based my original conclusion on > >> measuring the image on an iPad. But enlarged on a 20" screen, and making > >> allowance for the foreshortening, I estimate that the negative strip is > >> 27.5 > >> mm wide. A row of perforations could have been snipped off and still > leave > >> the full image frame. Why that was done is hard to say. Damage? Stripped > >> sprocket holes? > >> > >> The fact that the film was snipped does not mean that the negative shown > >> was > >> not a copy. E. Leitz (remember them?) made several devices for > duplicating > >> film strips including the Elida Film Printer, the Eldur Contact Printer, > >> and > >> the Kopat Combination Printer. One of the major scientific uses of the > >> Leica > >> camera was copying rare artifacts and manuscripts in situ. Leitz itself > >> suggested that distribution prints of rarities be produced from copy > >> negatives to avoid excessive handling and potential damage to > >> irreplaceable > >> original images. The HCB jump negative probably fits in that category. > >> Interestingly Leitz never suggested blowing up the negative to 4x5 size > to > >> make copy prints. The idea probably would have gone against the 35mm > bias > >> of > >> the company. A full description of Leica copying technique is spelled > out > >> in > >> Morgan and Lester's "Leica Manual," especially the editions published > >> before > >> 1950 when specialized microfilm copying equipment became widely > available. > >> > >> Larry Z > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > -- > > > > Henning J. Wulff > > Wulff Photography & Design > > mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com > > http://www.archiphoto.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/> // richard's personal photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]