Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/06/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Henning is right! I stand corrected. I based my original conclusion on measuring the image on an iPad. But enlarged on a 20" screen, and making allowance for the foreshortening, I estimate that the negative strip is 27.5 mm wide. A row of perforations could have been snipped off and still leave the full image frame. Why that was done is hard to say. Damage? Stripped sprocket holes? The fact that the film was snipped does not mean that the negative shown was not a copy. E. Leitz (remember them?) made several devices for duplicating film strips including the Elida Film Printer, the Eldur Contact Printer, and the Kopat Combination Printer. One of the major scientific uses of the Leica camera was copying rare artifacts and manuscripts in situ. Leitz itself suggested that distribution prints of rarities be produced from copy negatives to avoid excessive handling and potential damage to irreplaceable original images. The HCB jump negative probably fits in that category. Interestingly Leitz never suggested blowing up the negative to 4x5 size to make copy prints. The idea probably would have gone against the 35mm bias of the company. A full description of Leica copying technique is spelled out in Morgan and Lester's "Leica Manual," especially the editions published before 1950 when specialized microfilm copying equipment became widely available. Larry Z