Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/05/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] S2 - not the best apparently
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 07:00:14 +0200
References: <19E6ED3DECD74483ACAC0A3C9FCEBEA5@Family>

I can't believe he used such a cheap piece of junk, it is on special at B&H 
at $24.5K with lens (Ferrari edition, to boot, whatever that means).

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog

YNWA







On May 1, 2011, at 10:46 PM, Douglas Barry wrote:

> I naively assumed there's no place like Solms, but apparently there is a 
> better place in Sweden......
> 
> http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/royal_wedding_photographer_hugo_burnand_reveals_all_update_news_307097.html
> 
> Douglas
> _________
> Douglas Barry
> Bray, Co. Wicklow
> Republic of Ireland 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] S2 - not the best apparently)
In reply to: Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] S2 - not the best apparently)