Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Not that this represents a rigorous test, but I've made exposures at an exposure index of 6400 with the DMR (ISO 400, 4 stops under-exposed) and the resulting photos were certainly web-acceptable after a quick trip through Photoshop: http://wildlightphoto.com/birds/tyrannidae/atfl00.html (cropped, 560mm f/6.8, 1/125 sec, shoulder stock & monopod) Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com -----Original Message----- >From: grduprey at mchsi.com >Sent: Apr 23, 2011 11:22 AM >To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >Subject: Re: [Leica] DMR V D3s > >I will be interested in your testing/comparisons also. > >gene > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist3 at mac.com> >To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> >Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 8:55:13 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central >Subject: Re: [Leica] DMR V D3s > >Alastair, > >I will be most interested in your comparison of >dynamic range >and >fine detail rendering >at ISO 100, 200, 400 > >as well as >viewfinder brightness and focusing >with R glass > >thanks, > >Regards, >George Lottermoser >george at imagist.com >http://www.imagist.com >http://www.imagist.com/blog >http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information