Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/03/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Seriously OT: Jaguar XF?
From: kcarney1 at (Ken Carney)
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:54:08 -0600
References: <> <> <> <>

I think I might have put a bow on it and the reaction was oh, how 
sweet.  A few months later it turned to something like, now I know why 
you have so much life insurance on me.


On 3/11/2011 6:02 PM, John Collier wrote:
> Absolutely dramatic improvement in quality shortly after Ford took them 
> over. More than night and day, more like black hole to interior of the 
> sun. Still expensive to maintain, though.
> John
> On 2011-03-11, at 4:12 PM, Ken Carney wrote:
>> I bought my wife an XJ-6 one year.  Everyone told me not to do it.  They 
>> were right.  I would say "suspect quality issues" is a masterful 
>> understatement.
>> Ken
>> On 3/11/2011 9:16 AM, Roger Hart wrote:
>>> As far as looks go, the XF is terrific, inside and out. But take it
>>> from someone who drives cars for a living (I'm executive editor of
>>> AutoWeek and I occasionally shoot photos of them as well), Jags of the
>>> vintage you are talking about had some suspect quality issues. Be
>>> warned.
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See for more information

In reply to: Message from dstella1 at (Dante Stella) ([Leica] Seriously OT: Jaguar XF?)
Message from rhart76 at (Roger Hart) ([Leica] Seriously OT: Jaguar XF?)
Message from kcarney1 at (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Seriously OT: Jaguar XF?)
Message from jbcollier at (John Collier) ([Leica] Seriously OT: Jaguar XF?)