[Leica] Scanner comparison

[photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)]

No question, but since I have no drum scanner, no prospect of ever owning 
one, and no access to anyone who does (except paying a lab for scanning for 
me, at great expense). So yes, the more "adequate" I can get my Epson V700 
to scan, the better. I am now experimenting with the height adjustment on 
the beterscanning.com film holders.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog

YNWA







On Mar 7, 2011, at 6:12 AM, Marty Deveney wrote:

> The argument is about which scanners are *adequate*.  A drum scanner
> is still _best_ and I hear very few arguments with that, mostly
> because it's pretty obvious how amazing a good drum scan is.  A drum
> scan is still the only way to actually resolve the grain rather than
> to just get an image of the film grain.
> 
> Marty
> 
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com> 
> wrote:
>> Regret using film or that you no longer use film?
>> 
>> Seems like there will be no end of discussion about which scanner is 
>> "best."
>> Certainly the Epson seems to hold up quite well, especially for the price
>> and convenience.
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:46 AM, <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> wrote:
>> 
>>> Typically the kind of scan that makes me regret film ...
>>> 
>>> --
>> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
>> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/>
>> // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
>> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all 
>> previous
>> replies in your msgs. ]
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>