Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/02/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Was Re: IMG: A tad sad - now new Ilford paper
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:44:50 +1030
References: <AANLkTi=ft2_AmWdFJPDTqhaTSRWODrzq5e5BacXQt31y@mail.gmail.com> <BC2482B0-CE42-4D44-9CAA-062A1CB378CA@charter.net>

All modern photo emulsions have chloride, bromide, and iodide in them,
even "100% chloride" contact printing papers, which should be called
"overwhelmingly chloride" or "100%" or "pure" chloride.

I think I started too late to have used the old (1970s-80s) Oriental,
but prints I have seen on it certainly look beautiful.

Marty


On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Slobodan Dimitrov
<s.dimitrov at charter.net> wrote:
> It's looks like the old Oriental. But of course that's on a screen. They 
> don't call it a chloro-bromide paper either!
> S.d.
>
> On Feb 10, 2011, at 5:43 PM, Marty Deveney wrote:
>
>> I was wondering about that. ?I'll be delighted if it doesn't look
>> green in conventional Metol-HQ paper developers like Dektol like
>> Ilford FB Warmtone does.
>>
>> Marty
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Slobodan Dimitrov
>> <s.dimitrov at charter.net> wrote:
>>> Oops! Skipped a line. This was supposed to go under New Ilford paper.
>>> S.d.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 10, 2011, at 4:58 PM, Slobodan Dimitrov wrote:
>>>
>>>> If it's as warm as the image on the packaging, then I'm excited.
>>>> S.d.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 10, 2011, at 4:48 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> George,
>>>>>
>>>>> That looks like a real "gentleman's bar". ?He does look as if he is 
>>>>> deep in reflection.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jim Nichols
>>>>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist3 at 
>>>>> mac.com>
>>>>> To: "Group Users Leica" <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>>> Cc: "LRF reflex" <leicareflex at freelists.org>
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 6:42 PM
>>>>> Subject: [Leica] IMG: A tad sad
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://www.imagist.com/blog/?p=4893>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> c&c always appreciated
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> George Lottermoser
>>>>>> george at imagist.com
>>>>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>>>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Was Re: IMG: A tad sad - now new Ilford paper)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] Was Re: IMG: A tad sad - now new Ilford paper)