Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Some Cruise Ships
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:39:36 -0600
References: <AANLkTik_p4-PNDW9m9k2q5zaHL97+gFthT4Y2exS8oyD@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=G6nodi8emJFj-RdNhLOSC=VCS1ouMp2-_TdVh@mail.gmail.com> <327321.67350.qm@web82106.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
 
Absolutely true.

My feelings about it have nothing to do with reality or experience;
rather just an impression based on ads, commercials, etc.

Regards,
George
(from iPad)

On Jan 16, 2011, at 17:28, Bob Adler <rgacpa at yahoo.com> wrote:

> certainly isn't something 
> to be poo pooed.
> 
> Images of the trip are here:
> http://www.rgaphoto.com/2009-09-Cruise
> 
> I basically took one camera and 2 lenses (Canon 1DsIII, 24-105 and 
> 70-200f4) and 
> could have left the 70-200 behind...
> 
> So I guess it all depends on your outlook!
In reply to: Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Some Cruise Ships)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Some Cruise Ships)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Some Cruise Ships)