Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/12/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] the beautiful faces... on language ambiguity ... qui pro quo
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard at sfr.fr)
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:46:47 +0100 (CET)
References: <C9281BE8.7A05%mark@rabinergroup.com> <6F6BDBE8D80245F0B07AF0FCC7DF7CB0@syneticfeba505> <F71769EE-E047-4039-9018-7E453DEC9CBA@sfr.fr> <CEF4843B-8C0C-47C3-AA3E-A890D0B50A4B@gmail.com> <6D3F3595-822B-4ECA-9024-07BE2EFC3325@sfr.fr>
De : "Steve Barbour " <steve.barbour at gmail.com>
in that particular image, the focus was on fusako's new doo, by choice,
the subject of the posting...)
:-)
Ouch !
I didn't notice the title then, didn't even know the word "doo", and now
googling for "doo"
http://tinyurl.com/37p8be7
I find:
" feces/defecation:...poo (and variations such as poop and poopie)doo
(typically in dog doo, but see below) End of quote
I bet you meant " do ", as in
http://tinyurl.com/355pszn
Sorry for the unfortunate quiproquo.
My technical remarks fall all the same.
Really sorry even if ... ;-)
Amiti?s de Mutz
Philippe
Replies:
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] the beautiful faces... on language ambiguity ... qui pro quo)
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] the beautiful faces...)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] the beautiful faces...)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] the beautiful faces... on ambiguity)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] the beautiful faces... on ambiguity)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] the beautiful faces... on ambiguity)