Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] AARRGGHHH!!
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:40:40 -0600
References: <20101124061537.GI771@selenium.125px.com><C9122267.6DF9%mark@rabinergroup.com><20101124185101.GS1058@jbm.org><DF95B74F51344CAF8343B7965527A748@jimnichols> <20101124192758.GY1058@jbm.org>

You are correct, Jeff, as I remember the experience.  It was some time ago 
that I did this.  I don't doubt that I could have eventually found  a way to 
make it work for me, but I found that, for the limited number of images that 
I process, Elements just seemed easier and more straight forward.  I 
occasionally get frustrated with Elements, and its limited ability to 
address "curves", but it works for me in most instances.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Moore" <jbm at jbm.org>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] AARRGGHHH!!


> 2010-11-24-14:03:53 Jim Nichols:
>> I tried the trial version of Lightroom, and, I agree, it does a fine
>> job of editing.  However, I could never overcome my frustration with
>> its image organizing features, which choose "their desired path"
>> regardless of what "I" chose to do.  I eventually went back to
>> Elements, and have no regrets. I save my images in a manner that I
>> choose to use.
>
> Are you just talking about the naming and on-disk placement of image
> files?  Because you can use Lightroom and not have to let it do
> anything of that sort.  I copy new images onto the disk according to
> my preferred folder structure and file naming conventions, then just
> tell Lightroom to import them into the catalog in place (which I think
> is the "Add" operation, as opposed to the Copy, Copy as DNG, or Move
> flavors).  The original files then aren't copied or moved by Lightroom.
>
> LR3 acquired some finer-grained controls for file renaming (and
> convert/not-convert to DNG on ingest, and make a backup copy somewhere
> else if desired as part of the process), but I'm still doing my
> renaming pre-Lightroom because neither Lightroom nor Bridge seems to
> support batch file renaming with sequence numbers per camera/date,
> where the sequence number automatically starts back at 1 when the date
> flips.
>
> Or have I misunderstood what wasn't working for you about Lightroom
> organization?  The other organization bits would be collections and
> keyword tagging, which seem to pretty much do what one would expect.
>
> -Jeff
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




In reply to: Message from tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray) ([Leica] AARRGGHHH!!)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] AARRGGHHH!!)
Message from jbm at jbm.org (Jeff Moore) ([Leica] AARRGGHHH!!)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] AARRGGHHH!!)
Message from jbm at jbm.org (Jeff Moore) ([Leica] AARRGGHHH!!)