Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)')
From: chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com (Chris Crawford)
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 21:41:23 -0500

Send me the F3, I'll use it. :D

I just bought one to use my Nikon glass on since my F4 died and I gave my
Nikon D-SLR to my son, who mostly uses a 50mm macro lens. Figured I better
get myself a Nikon film body to use my lenses, and I really like the F3 now
that I have one.


-- 
Chris Crawford
Fine Art Photography
Fort Wayne, Indiana
260-486-2581

http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My portfolio

http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My latest work!

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798
Become a fan on Facebook



On 11/7/10 6:03 PM, "grduprey at mchsi.com" <grduprey at mchsi.com> wrote:

> Marty,

The Nikon 85/1.4 is a nice lens, and the F3 is also a very good body.
> However I sold the 85 years ago and the F3 just sits and collects dust, 
> well I
> do keep it dusted off and exercise the shutter occasionally.  I prefer the 
> R8
> to it any day, now if I can just find a really nice 80/1.4R lens for a
> reasonable price.  ;-)

Cheers
Gene

----- Original Message -----
From: "Marty
> Deveney" <benedenia at gmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group"
> <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 6, 2010 6:13:12 PM GMT -06:00
> US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: [Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid?
> (R content)')

The 90 APO is very impressive, but at portrait distances it is
> less
impressive than further away - the absence of a floating element
starts
> to show and there is noticeable curvature of field.  This was
the motivation
> for the design used in the 75 Summicron, which focuses
to 0.75 m and gets you
> a tighter crop, and is the M lens I'd recommend
if you'd like a very modern
> rendering lens for portraits.

The 80 R-Summilux is a very nice older design,
> but for less money you
can get a Nikkor 85/1.4 and an F3 and the photos will
> be
indistiguishable, except possibly unless you have a bunch of other
Leica R
> glass and shoot in colour and are not willing to manipulate to
match the
> colours. It would also mean that you may have to carry a
bunch of extra gear
> (which is also heavy
> gear).

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/freakscene/Rachel/File0846.jpg.html


> I kept the Nikkor but returned the test sample 80 Summilux because I
like the
> F3 better than any of the R cameras and I already have a
bunch of other Nikon
> SLR lenses.

Marty


On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Mark Rabiner
> <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
> Big difference though between an old Leitz
> Canada Summicron 90 for the R
> system and a brand new razor sharp cutting
> edge
> LEICA APO-SUMMICRON-R 90 mm f/2 ASPH whose specs outdo the 100 macro
> which
> was spec king for a few decades. We should be specific as to what we
> are
> talking about.
> I'd be shooting with it.
> And I am now as I have it
> for the M and I think is the same lens expect it
> has an M on it with an M
> mount.
> There is nothing "slow" about an 90mm f2 lens. Especially when
> shooting
> digitally.
> Leica seems to me which is why I like it to be a
> company which gets smarter
> as it goes along. When it comes out with a new
> lens its better than what
> comes before. Usually by a long shot. As
> everything they've learned about
> optics during that time gets put into that
> lens. The old classic designs are
> great as long as I get my basics covered
> first. And my basics are the
> current offerings from Leica. Their most recent
> designs. And I don't mind
> getting their ears. Tip of their nose even.
> Glasses. More than just their
> eyelashes.
>
>
> --------------------
> Mark
> William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>
> mark at rabinergroup.com
> Cars: ? http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb
>
>
>
>
>> From:
> Tim Gray <tgray at 125px.com>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group
> <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:09:00 -0400
>> To: Leica
> Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: [Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I
> being stupid? (R content)')
>>
>> In my talk of Leica R stuff, I completely
> forgot about the 80 Summilux. ?Any
>> comments on this lens compared to the 90
> Summicron? ?What's a good price for
>> the 80?
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See
> http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See
> http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> information
>

_______________________________________________
Leica Users
> Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> information

_______________________________________________
Leica Users
> Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))