Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 90 AA - focus shift?
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 10:39:35 +1000
References: <C49D8150-E2D0-4E99-91F7-F8707FA3E566@125px.com> <89693D1F-AE98-44D0-8895-EE67BDE15556@shaw.ca>

Let's see samples everyone!

Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
NO ARCHIVE

On 8 November 2010 09:24, John Collier <jbcollier at shaw.ca> wrote:

> I can't comment on the digital/focus shift issue but my 90/2AA was tack
> sharp though out the focus range. Wide open it was slightly softer in the
> corners up close but only slightly and light years ahead of any other 80 to
> 110 lens.
>
> John
>
> On 2010-11-07, at 1:20 PM, Tim Gray wrote:
>
> > I've heard the 90 AA is a wonderful lens. I've also heard that it is
> horrible below 3 m OR it loses a bit of performance in that range.  
> Probably
> closer to the latter, but I'd like to hear opinions on that if you have 
> any.
>  How good/bad is it closer in?
> >
> > Which brings me to my 2nd question. I've read that the decrease in
> performance close in on this lens is due to focus shift. True? Does that
> mean there is a plane of bitingly sharp detail, but just not where you want
> it to be?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray) ([Leica] 90 AA - focus shift?)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] 90 AA - focus shift?)