Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Let's see samples everyone! Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman NO ARCHIVE On 8 November 2010 09:24, John Collier <jbcollier at shaw.ca> wrote: > I can't comment on the digital/focus shift issue but my 90/2AA was tack > sharp though out the focus range. Wide open it was slightly softer in the > corners up close but only slightly and light years ahead of any other 80 to > 110 lens. > > John > > On 2010-11-07, at 1:20 PM, Tim Gray wrote: > > > I've heard the 90 AA is a wonderful lens. I've also heard that it is > horrible below 3 m OR it loses a bit of performance in that range. > Probably > closer to the latter, but I'd like to hear opinions on that if you have > any. > How good/bad is it closer in? > > > > Which brings me to my 2nd question. I've read that the decrease in > performance close in on this lens is due to focus shift. True? Does that > mean there is a plane of bitingly sharp detail, but just not where you want > it to be? > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >