Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparison M9, R9
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 22:31:06 -0400

At f 11 or f 8 at iso 100 or 160 the difference in format is minimized
certainly at these magnifications.



--------------------
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
mark at rabinergroup.com
Cars:   http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb




> From: Jeff Moore <jbm at jbm.org>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:36:45 -0400
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Comparison M9, R9
> 
> 2010-11-06-19:06:03 Tina Manley:
>> Here are two shots from today.  One with the M9 and 90 Summicron:
>> 
>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/130103020
>> 
>> and one with the R9, DMR, and 80 Summilux:
>> 
>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/130103614
> 
> Interesting.  The M9/90 picture looks crispier, for what that's worth,
> but these photos are hard to compare - the M9 picture has harder, more
> direct light while the R picture is more cloud-diffused;  the white
> balances seem different;  it's possible that custom DNG profiles would
> help, if you haven't already done those;  blah, blah, blah.
> 
> For reasons which probably have nothing to do with the equipment used,
> I think I like the R one a bit better.  It seems like raw material
> from which a photo I'd like could be cropped.
> 
>  -Jeff
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from jbm at jbm.org (Jeff Moore) ([Leica] Comparison M9, R9)