Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well now... better than M8 is no praise is this case :-) As much as I love my M9 and also the E-3, above ISP1600 is not so good. Then again, neither is my XPan, Delta 3200 works, but... So I'm an ISO-1600 or below photog :-) On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Lluis Ripoll <lluisripollquerol at gmail.com>wrote: > Great Jeff!, stunning quality > > The rendition of the M9 at ISO 2500 is really good, at least if I compare > with the M8 > > Saludos > Lluis > > > El 21/10/2010, a las 8:30, Jeff Moore escribi?: > > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/jbm/LUGfolk/ >> >> ...and the first field appearance in my hands of the newfangled >> floating-element 35mm Summilux-M (yes, I did it). >> >> M9 at ISO 2500. No light to speak of. >> >> -Jeff >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com> // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]