Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica X1: now glasses
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:03:24 -0400

I shot an add for the Varilux Progressive Lens company once (I think they
invented it) when I was first starting out. Very high tech with a huge
optical machine in the gals face. In a very small room I had to use my
widest lens. Which was a 24mm 2.8 Nikkor AI. Which I still have.

--------------------
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
mark at rabinergroup.com


> From: "J. Newell" <john.o.newell at comcast.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 18:15:26 +0000 (UTC)
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica X1: now glasses
> 
> ...and the effect increases with the degree of correction(s). 
> Nevertheless, I
> prefer "progressives" (or would we say "varifocal" on this list?), but 
> this is
> a real YMMV issue. Personally, I don't like using glasses at all with 
> cameras
> because you get one or more of (1) incomplete FOV, (2) scratched lenses 
> and/or
> (3) dirty lenses. I am still using dioptric correction on the cameras and
> living without correction for astignatism but, again, YMMV. The only really
> good solution is perfect vision, which for some implies getting younger and
> for others never existed anyway. <sigh>
> 
> John 




In reply to: Message from john.o.newell at comcast.net (J. Newell) ([Leica] Leica X1: now glasses)