Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Right! in my books the only systems that ever got anywhere near to Leica in lens quality and camera handling were Contax RTS/Zeiss lenses and Rollei 3003/Zeiss lenses. Both of which were also almost prohibitively expensive and never really found any fans in the pro-segment. The only camera from Canon I have really liked and used was (still use and still is) the amazingly versatile A1 - it even almost has the solid and reliable feel of a Leica, but its a rather "cold" camera in comparison. Cheers Douglas On 08.09.2010 09:21, Frank Dernie wrote: > That is bollocks Mark. The reason most used Nikon or Canon was cost not > quality. If you had used BOTH for a period of time you would know that. > Like the other people who have used both for a period of time. > > Get positive, > Frank > > On 8 Sep, 2010, at 07:28, Mark Rabiner wrote: > >> For me to state that the Leica R was not seen as highly as the M is only >> me >> relating a well known long known fact. > Greystacks, > 18 Denchworth Road, > Wantage, > OX12 9AU > > +44 (0)1235 768505 > +44 (0)7803 135214 > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >