Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]He's a little unclear on weights and how to use a scale First thing he says is his bag weights 2.2 oz. national geographic no longer made. And the Domke weights 2.4 oz. Well I was confused so I took out a similar Domke bag I had and it was 2 pounds 2 ounces. So that's 34 oz. with 16 oz in a pound. 34 vs. 36 oz on just the bag? the weight difference would be like a very small fraction. What happens when you put a lens in it? I do think if your bag is heavy before you even put anything in it there is less sense in that. But a stuffed bag requires a well built bag. As we area talking about several pounds which need to be supported. At this point I like the Domke slings. But am looking at the Kata. I am a bag a holic. Always looking for the right bag and a better bag. -------------------- Mark William Rabiner Photography mark at rabinergroup.com > From: "Robert D. Baron" <rbaron at concentric.net> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:13:07 -0500 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: [Leica] Need More Bags? > > You think so? > > Watch this short video featuring M8 shooter David Alan Harvey: > > http://vimeo.com/9831500 > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information