Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?
From: richard at (Richard Man)
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:46:15 -0700
References: <>

John Sexton, who was assistant to Ansel Adams, just sent out a newsletter
disputing the validity. From the sound of it, it looks like he wrote that
before the Uncle Earl revelation. His biggest argument? Adams would have
made prints, but none exists for these 65 plates, which is uncharacteristic
of Adams.

I think Case Closed. I wonder if "Taken By Uncle Earl" will become a new
photography lexicon.

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at> wrote:

> In case you haven't seen this:
> Ken Carney
> Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See for more information

// richard <>
// icc blog: <>
// photo blog: <>
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]

In reply to: Message from kcarney1 at (Ken Carney) ([Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?)