Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/07/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Photoshopping for Truth? (and a sneaky real estate FS Friday)
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 22:44:22 -0400
References: <20100706221134.5d841a7c@linux-0ifi.site> <C8595C3B.642EE%mark@rabinergroup.com> <20100706223909.1d45d4cf@linux-0ifi.site>
This is fine so long as we all realize that the original, unphotoshopped
photo was not reality--it was a view of a portion of reality as curated by
an artist with a camera. Altering an image should not be confused with the
altering of reality. Reality is largely subjective.
ric
On Jul 6, 2010, at 10:39 PM, Philip Forrest wrote:
> Maybe I'm in the wrong for wanting an image to remain unaltered as a
> part of the historical record.
Replies:
Reply from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] Photoshopping for Truth?)
In reply to:
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] Photoshopping for Truth? (and a sneaky real estate FS Friday))
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Photoshopping for Truth? (and a sneaky real estate FS Friday))
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] Photoshopping for Truth? (and a sneaky real estate FS Friday))