Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/06/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] The baby
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:33:57 +0200
References: <9A15244B-F964-4F6D-A1FF-2F375CFFA760@gmail.com> <7F3DE716-929B-47F9-B58B-4833E52DD6FD@mac.com> <090B5AB1-592E-42D4-9772-72709159D0B6@gmail.com> <D2A91332-93C2-4CEC-89D2-46097A32CCFD@mac.com> <611A256F-17D8-4E4B-A526-36E42DF0D84D@gmail.com>
 
Hi Lluis,

while I agree in a large part with George, which I hadn't realised  
until I read his comments, my first reaction was to think that this  
young mother was unhappy, baby blues? Perhaps just because of the  
angle you've selected?
Anyway it stands as uch, and works for me.


Amiti?s du matin
Philippe

Le 16 juin 10 ? 00:45, Lluis Ripoll Querol a ?crit :

PS

>
>  IMHO...the viewers are not subjective and you are right
>

I don't think viewers are objective, by essence there is no  
objectivity at all in photography IMHO, which makes it an art, and not  
a reproduction technique.
Your art pleases my subjectivity ;-)

> Saludos
> Lluis
In reply to: Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] The baby)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] The baby)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] The baby)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] The baby)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] The baby)