Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/05/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]What I use, for what a situation calls for, is my business. As it is, most clients are visual illiterates. The better editors rarely interfere. These days one is bound to get a kid who's on the job by default. All they know is pricing, from there end, and rarely know shoot requirements. But I have to say, I have an image of Paulo Freire, shot with an M4 and 3rg gen 35mm 'cron, going into a sociology textbook. It was shot on TX, indoors, and barely printable. Today, I can outshoot that equipment combination with the Canon S90, or better with a T2i, never mind any late 1D. The only reason the shot is being printed is that he's dead, and the only image that I know of where he's looking into the camera. Otherwise, it's a poor technical quality image. S.d. On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com> wrote: > Say, so you are a PRO and shooting with a finger nail sized sensor and get > paid for it?!! > > Blasphemy! :-) > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:03 PM, slobodan dimitrov < > slobodan.dimitrov at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I have one, along with the dedicated underwater case. While it's not as > > good > > in low light as the most recent Canon, or Nikon, it's better in low light > > than a G10, by far. I've had a number of shots published shot with it. > The > > client asked no questions about the quality. > > I'm thinking of getting this little critter for it; > > http://www.kleptography.com/rf/#camera_s90 > > > > -- > // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> > // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com> > // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com> > [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous > replies in your msgs. ] > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >