Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/05/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]You may not agree with what he wrote but I do. The longer I use my M9 the less inclined I am to get my Nikon D3x out. Autofocus is not essential for me, and I find with fast primes I can get the part of the frame -I- want in focus more consistently and faster than I can dicking around trying to get the AF sensor pointing at the right part of the frame. For slow lens shots of active grandchildren AF is a godsend, though. I am always bowled over by the results from the M9. I do have movie capability on a couple of DSLRs but don't use it (I thought I would...) Frank ----- Original Message ---- From: Vince Passaro <passaro.vince at gmail.com> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Saturday, 15 May, 2010 20:58:14 Subject: Re: [Leica] Quick M9 Review from the UK Daily Telegraph While to many of us video on a photo camera seems a useless waste of resources money weight and whatever else goes into it, they filmed Monday's final episode of House with a Canon 5d Mk II and there are videographers out there quite excited about the possibilities of this semi-new 'medium' or new format. And the multi pixel multi color screens and other features within an elaborate DSLR menu that the review casually dismisses do in fact contribute to better photographs. Leica's lack of autofocus is great for the purists among us but it's idiotic to say that other cameras are wasting your time with such things. He says this is technologically the best digital full frame 35mm camera in the world but I hope Canan or Nikon make one that we can all afford? How does that work? Nikon's best camera costs $8K. And Nikon and Canon? They don't MAKE rangefinders. Hello. What's really aggravating about the breezy bullshit of the review is that the writer of it clearly knows enough about this stuff to not say this nonsensical crap but he doesn't care: no knowledge will be permitted to come between him and his typing. He probably didn't even start this largely content -free piece until about 90 minutes before dealine. That kind fo critical writing gives writers a bad name. Vince On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote: > I agree. Read my comment. ;-) > > Tina > > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Rei Shinozuka <shino at panix.com> wrote: > > > Let's cut to the chase here: > > > > "The Leica does one thing and it does it better than any other digital > > camera on the market today: it takes pictures. Coupled with any lens that > > Leica produces, it will take sharper, more dynamic and more accurate > images > > than anything else. ... The M9 is the best digital camera on the market > > today. " > > > > Hyperbolic? Perhaps, but my soul agrees. > > > > -rei > > > > > > On 05/15/2010 02:01 PM, Neil Beddoe wrote: > > > >> > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/advice/7725261/Leica-M9-review.html > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > > -- > Tina Manley, ASMP > www.tinamanley.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information