Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG and finally.... Panasonic G1 and Lumix 14-45
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:59:06 -0500
References: <s2o19b6d42d1004172251t2693d919i67c52242c0900dfa@mail.gmail.com> <3CCFA92B-AC6B-44FE-B623-4D781E2D3BD1@steveunsworth.co.uk>

appears to be "letting the camera do the thinking"
in your example the camera assumed the sky was more important than  
the people or buildings.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Apr 18, 2010, at 2:59 AM, Steve Unsworth wrote:

> A lot of them seem rather underexposed and dark on my screen - see  
> this for an example...
>
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/toast+eatin_+bog+man/Friday 
> +Flowers+and+Flatiron/New+York+City+flowers+and 
> +buildings_100416_0511.JPG.html>
>
> Not sure if it's a metering or an 'artistic' issue, but I'd prefer  
> to see them lighter.
>
> Steve
>
> On 18 Apr 2010, at 06:51, Vince Passaro wrote:
>
>> For those even mildly interested, Henning led the discussion the  
>> other day
>> on the m4/3 Lumix14-45mm 3.5-5.6 zoom. All the pictures in this set,
>> including some black and whites of the flatiron building etc, were  
>> taken
>> with that lens on the G1 camera.
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/toast+eatin_+bog+man/Friday 
>> +Flowers+and+Flatiron/
>>
>> C and C as always much appreciated and even heeded, sometimes.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] IMG and finally.... Panasonic G1 and Lumix 14-45)
Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] IMG and finally.... Panasonic G1 and Lumix 14-45)