Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think you're right, both versions of the Flatiron are exposed for the highlights and need considerable brightening in PS although I must say they didn't appear nearly so dark in PS Bridge when the room I work in was lamplit, in the otherwise dark. Today in a brighter room and on the LUG they look much darker. All the higher contrast ones need post-processing work but having limited time I am often loathe to do that on images probably unworthy of the time investment. If they'd looked that bad on my screen last night I wouldn't have posted them. Thanks. V On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Steve Unsworth <lug at steveunsworth.co.uk>wrote: > A lot of them seem rather underexposed and dark on my screen - see this for > an example... > > < > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/toast+eatin_+bog+man/Friday+Flowers+and+Flatiron/New+York+City+flowers+and+buildings_100416_0511.JPG.html > > > > Not sure if it's a metering or an 'artistic' issue, but I'd prefer to see > them lighter. > > Steve > > On 18 Apr 2010, at 06:51, Vince Passaro wrote: > > > For those even mildly interested, Henning led the discussion the other > day > > on the m4/3 Lumix14-45mm 3.5-5.6 zoom. All the pictures in this set, > > including some black and whites of the flatiron building etc, were taken > > with that lens on the G1 camera. > > > > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/toast+eatin_+bog+man/Friday+Flowers+and+Flatiron/ > > > > C and C as always much appreciated and even heeded, sometimes. > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >