Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> On Apr 17, 2010 at 02:58 PM -0400, Mark Rabiner wrote: >> The point of the lenses line is to not offer Leica users a lower piece >> point >> or to pawn of cheaply made clunky glass as Zeiss to Canon Nikon users. >> The point of the lens is they are made by Zeiss. >> And of course they are mainly directed at video and movie people but it >> appears also at stills people. That's me. > > It seems to me the point is to offer these lenses with cine-style > ergonomics. Which is one of the last things I'd want if I was shooting > stills. > > A 4.5 inch front diameter does not sound appealing to me on a SLR. It > sounds perfectly reasonably if I was shooting with a rig for motion, > whether > that was an SLR or a traditional camera. When you are hanging matte boxes, > follow focus systems, and other accessories, it makes sense to have a > housing that is a standardized size across the line, and absolute size > makes > less of a difference. > > Which is why I made my previous statement. If you wanted to shoot stills > with this (which is the only reason you'd adapt it to R, as you asked), why > not buy one of the ZF/ZE/ZK lenses? > Well maybe you have experience in shooting stills with glass with cine ergonomics for most of us its a brave new world. And Zeiss seems to think there's something in it. If we are looking at T stops instead of f stops then maybe that's a deal breaker. Bu the idea of having an oversized focus grabber sounds very ok to me. And I like the colored numbers. I like numbers. That's part of why I like macro lenes. All kinds of numbers. And I mentioned that I am not fond of the build of look or price point of the ZF/ZE/ZK lenses. [Rabs] Mark William Rabiner