Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It's from the very worst period in photography, when the 35mm SLR manufactures jammed the public with their trash. S.d. On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:08 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > That was my reaction to it as well. Unsharp, lots of flare in the corner. > > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > > Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > > > > > > On Apr 16, 2010, at 6:57 AM, slobodan Dimitrov wrote: > >> You're kidding, right? >> It's a hideous image! >> S.d. >> >> >> On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:39 PM, Vince Passaro wrote: >> >>> This picture ran on the front page of the New York Times the day after >>> Stevens announced his resignation. They still have it on the lens blog. >>> It's an uncredited AP photo. I like it a lot, I think it's a great >>> photograph. I wonder what others think, and, specifically, what size lens >>> people think it was taken with. I'm thinking 35mm or even 28mm and >>> cropped >>> but I don't know nothin'. >>> >>> People's reactions would be of great interest to me. >>> >>> Here's the url: >>> http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2010/04/09/us/20100409-stevens-slideshow_index.html?ref=politics >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information